Both cameras have a microphone input and headphone output. The sensor structure is different: the Sony chip is a BSI type (back-illuminated) which collects light more efficiently than the traditional structure. I’ve used the electronic shutter for birds in flight on the Canon and these distortions were not too visible, also thanks to the more complex shape of the animal itself. The Sony does well with birds in flight but doesn’t reach the same level as the R6, with my score being 77% / 96%. They offer a good number of controls with an AF joystick and various dials and buttons around the body, and most of them can be customised. If you are curious to understand how I measure the score for birds in flight, and to see how other cameras performed, check our article below. There are no surprises here. | Full frame (35.8 x 23.8 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor. I used the Canon RF 24-105mm f4 and and the Sony FE 24-105mm f4 OSS. The Nikon Z6 II and the Sony Alpha A7 III are two enthusiast cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in October 2020 and February 2018. The High Speed mode on the EOS R6 (1080p/120p) is limited to 7 minutes. I’m pretty comfortable with canon menus, so obviously adjusting to Sony would take time. On both cameras you can use the LCD screen to move the AF point while using the viewfinder. TABLE OF CONTENTSMain Specs—1. As nice as the R6 sounds, there are some strong points in favour of the A7 III to keep in mind. 92 points. Canon EOS R6 vs Nikon Z6 II vs Panasonic S1 vs Sony A7 III: Summary As you can see, each camera and camera system has its pros and cons, and it is hard to pick an absolute winner. Portrait (Color Depth) 26 bits. The same difference, accentuated with more contrast on each, is valid for the SOOC JPG and standard profile. Viewfinder and LCD8. Above: The screen on the R6 is a little smaller: 3in 1.62 million dot vs 3.2in 2.1 million dot on the R5, but most importantly it remains side-hinged and fully-articulated with the same excellent touchscreen interface – two aspects Canon continues to enjoy over Sony, although I do appreciate some people prefer screens that only tilt vertically. The EOS R6 has 20.1MP, whereas the A7 III has 24.2MP. With a bit more light the A7 III can give you decent performance, but this test was the most appropriate to show the difference. It may not have 4K/60p or 10-bit internal recording for video, but it doesn’t suffer from overheating as severely as the Canon. Are you reading from your mobile phone? This doesn’t happen in C-AF mode. The EOS R6 marks a relevant step forward for Canon by including specifications that filmmakers have been waiting for. Better low-light and dynamic range (all else equal) Newer. Both Canon R6 and Sony A7 III has Sensor based Image stabilization which means that all the lenses will be stabilized in these bodies. Sony A7S III vs Canon EOS R5 price and availability The Canon EOS R5 and Sony A7S III were both announced in mid-2020. Sony A7 III vs Canon EOS R6 ... Landscape (Dynamic Range) 14.7 Evs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Canon R6 and Sony A7 III side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Canon R6 was introduced to market in July 2020 and Sony A7 III was launched in February 2018. Below you can see the front view size comparison of Canon R6 and Sony A7 III. Canon R6 and Sony A7 III's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3". In our second example, we attempt to recover the highlights. As always, remember that there are other factors that can influence the results: In my experience, you don’t always get the same performance every time, but knowing how far you can push the shutter speed and, more important, at which shutter speed the camera gives you a decent keeper rate is useful. The Canon portrait style is brighter but has lots of reds in the medium tints. The R6 shows a similar amount of noise in the underexposed image taken at ISO 640 and recovered in post, and the image shot at the higher ISO level. Canon EOS R6 vs Sony A7R III COMPARISON SELECTION (3 selected items max.) Thanks! 66 points. The A7iii now sits in the top 5 of Sony cameras ranked on DXO Mark, placing a solid 4th, right above the A7R and below the A7RIII, a7RII, and RX1Rii. ... Low Light. I guess we’re not quite at the point where HEIF will become the new JPG. Sony A7 III has external dimensions of 127 x 96 x 74 mm (5 x 3.78 x 2.91″) and weighs 650 g (1.43 lb / 22.93 oz) (including batteries). (See the full list in our R5 vs R6 article.). Canon R6 has external dimensions of 138 x 98 x 88 mm (5.43 x 3.84 x 3.48″) and weighs 680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz) (including batteries). However the Q menu on the Canon can’t be customised. Both cameras are built around a magnesium alloy chassis and offer weather-sealing. I’m pretty sure that we will start to see more third party RF lenses at some point, and once again you have access to the DSLR equivalents, although it is fair to say that EF lenses work on the A7 III too and there are many adapters available. 20fps. Max Yuryev has compared 5 of the latest mirrorless cameras in regards of 4K low light high iso noise comparison: Canon EOS R, Sony a7 III, Fuji X-T3, Nikon Z7, Blackmagic Pocket 4K, which camera do you think has the best low light performance?. The EOS R6 has a better viewfinder with more resolution (3.69M dots vs 2.36M dots) and a faster refresh rate (120Hz vs 60Hz). Below you can see how close you get when the following image is viewed at 100%. Each camera brand has some quirks, but Canon, Nikon, and Sony all make great camera systems. However, it is important to point out that the Canon RF super-telephoto lenses that have been announced with the EOS R5 and R6 cameras have a maximum aperture of f/11, and they cannot be directly compared to the high-end 400mm f/2.8 and 600mm f/4 options from Sony. Phase detection points are used solely for autofocus, not to create the photo. The Canon EOS R6 can shoot up to 12fps, or 20fps if you use the electronic shutter. Curiously, when the e-shutter is enabled, the R6 always shoots at 20fps even if you select the Medium or Low burst speed. The minimum sensitivity for the EOS R6 autofocus is -6.5Ev with an f/1.2 lens or -5Ev at f/2. This is certainly a disadvantage to these cameras in my view, since the top LCD screen can be quite useful when shooting. You can of course buy one separately. (I couldn’t find any information about this for the Canon model). The Canon has a lot of settings to control the autofocus behaviour, and some of them are not easy to understand at first. 5. continuous shooting at high resolution. The A7 III has more profiles in total (13 vs 7, including the monochrome profiles and excluding the custom ones). Looking for a Sony A7R III vs Canon R6 comparison? 66 points. The EOS R6 has a newly developed battery that increases the power by 14% while maintaining the same form factor as the previous one. Another thing is the quality of the display when focus magnification is activated in video mode. Removing anti-alias filter increases the sharpness and level of detail but at the same time, it increases the chance of moire occurring in certain scenes. Our newsletter goes out every week on Sunday. The Canon feels a bit quicker but it’s a small difference. When the subject turned around, the performance was the same. Interestingly, if the subject wears a hat, the Canon can get confused more easily and mis-focus on the brim rather than the eyes. Up to ISO 4000, I haven’t noticed any significant difference between the two cameras, though I know that the A7III, should look better, at least on paper, as you went beyond that. In the sequence, the Sony was able to capture only 4 shots, and 3 of them were out of focus. Its body is 11mm narrower, 2mm shorter and 14mm thinner than Canon R6. (the AF performance is not always as fast however). The A7R III is less expensive. SONY A7III vs CANON 5D MK IV LOW LIGHT PORTRAIT COMPARISON August 3, 2018 by Julia Trotti. Tip for sharper images taken hand-held at slow shutter speedsYou can increase the success rate by using the electronic front curtain shutter and shoot in continuous burst mode (you don’t need the fastest fps). The A7 III phase detection coverage on the sensor is 93% which is not bad at all. The A7 III already looks sharper with the default settings whereas it’s difficult to play with the parameters on the R6 without making the image look over-sharpened and less realistic. 90 . 24MP has been the standard of prosumer full frame cameras for some time now, so you may find the 20MP of the R6 a bit disappointing. This should, on paper, give an advantage to the A7 III in terms of dynamic range and high sensitivities. Canon R6 and Sony A7 III sensors have been tested by DxO and the results show that A7 III has a better overall score of 96, 6 points higher compared to R6's score of 90. Personally, even though I knew the Sony A7sII and A7III had great low light capabilities, I still rarely went about ISO 4000. Sony A7S III vs Canon R5 Side-by-Side Comparison. Reminder: the links below are affiliate links. Autofocus3. Sony a7 III Real World Review vs Sony a7R III, Nikon D850 & Canon 6D Mark II Nikon D7500 "Real World Review" the BEST Beginner Sports / Nature Photography Camera? The Canon also has a High level and a Multi NR mode that merges three images to reduce noise further. Now let's compare some sample lenses from each mount with typical Focal ranges for Canon R6 and Sony A7 III to see how these lenses compares: You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Canon R6 and Sony A7 III, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Another difference is the ISO sensitivity: the EOS R6 has a smaller normal range than for stills (100 to 25600) but the extended values go up to 204800 ISO. 84 points. The one thing to note is what body you choose. Concerning the manual focus assists, in addition to magnification and peaking, the R6 has the excellent Focus Guide mode that shows you in which direction and how much you need to adjust focus using the Dual Pixel CMOS AF technology on the sensor. Sports (Low-Light ISO) 3394 ISO. Don’t forget to subscribe to our YouTube channel! If the animal is not detected for some reason, the camera uses the normal tracking mode which is also very effective. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. Scores; Specifications ... Landscape (Dynamic Range) 14.3 Evs. Note: If you’re wondering why the A7 III took fewer shots, it is because I set it to focus priority and since it was a bit slower at keeping track of the subject, it captured fewer images as a result. Which Is Better: Nikon or Canon or Sony? You can prioritise the left or right eye, or a face when multiple people are in the frame with the AF joystick. It rightfully became one of the most popular full frame cameras ever. On the A7 III, you have two options: you can activate Face/Eye AF and the camera detects face and eyes at all times when engaging focus. Keep in mind that some of the Canon profiles like Neutral or Faithful have less sharpness assigned by default. Landscape (Dynamic Range) 14.7 Evs. Because of the smaller magnification, I can see the extreme corners a bit better on the R6 when wearing glasses. I found the default configuration of the R6 good to use out of the box. It crops the sensor as a result however. Sensor and image quality Both cameras use a full frame (35mm format) sensor. Sony A7S III advantages over Canon R6. I only had to change the function of the three dials (mainly to move the aperture from the rear wheel to the top one). Slower slow-motion. At $1,300, it undercut the base price of both the Sony … Plus, the shutter lag of the camera is really short. The first thing I noticed while doing my tests is that there is a difference in brightness when using the same exposure settings with the two camera. The R6 has a faster sensor readout and suffers less from it, as you can see below. Xepplin, It’s an amazing sensor on R6. The Canon RF system was launched two years ago, and Canon started from scratch without even including compatibility with its EOS M APS-C mirrorless system. Want to see a quick overview of what this article is about? The R6 offers up to 8 stops of compensation which is the highest rating of any camera given by the CIPA association (even better than high-end Olympus products). The Z7 has the same sensor as the A7RIII which is 46MP, while the Z6 has the A7III 24MP sensor. The green pepper has a bit more contrast and darker shades as well, whereas the orange is a bit more saturated in the Sony file. I have to admit that in this short amount of time, Canon has worked hard to release a lot of high quality lenses, from the 2.8 zoom trinity to fast 1.2 primes to super telephotos. In this review, we will be comparing R6 and A7 III, two Pro Mirrorless cameras from Canon and Sony. As you can see, A7 III is 2 years older than R6. Holy shit, the quality of this article is atrocious. Nikon Z6 II vs Sony A7 III. Also keep in mind that body weight is not the only deciding factor when comparing two interchangeable camera bodies, you have to also take into account the lenses that you will be using with these bodies. Also keep in mind that body weight is not the only deciding factor when comparing two interchangeable camera bodies, you have to also take into account the lenses that you will be using with these bodies. Bigger pixels. Portrait (Color Depth) 24.2 bits. We know selecting between two big brands is not an easy decision. A low ISO 50 value is available too, and the maximum level with the extended setting is 204800 ISO. If you tweak the parameters on the R6, you can achieve a similar result, Colour differences are similar to what I describe with the SOOC JPGs (although the Picture Styles have a bit less contrast in video mode on the R6), The Picture Profiles on the A7 III have more advanced settings to fine-tune colours and other image parameters, The Canon Log profile has more saturation with the default values, Canon’s 10-bit recording saves more colour information but the H265 format can be computer heavy depending on your setup, Just like for JPG stills, the R6 has more settings to control dynamic range (highlights especially), but the A7 III has more DR when used with S-Log3, Similar performance up to 12800 ISO, then the R6 shows more noise, but you can control Noise Reduction in four steps unlike the Sony, C-AF performance in extreme low light is similar (unlike for stills where the R6 is superior), The Canon is a bit faster and more precise with C-AF and Face/Eye detection, The A7 III has no Eye AF for video, just face detection, which can sometimes mis-focus such as, for example, when the subject wears a hat, The R6 has better stabilisation for fixed shots or when panning, but walking produces abrupt vertical movements, The A7 III has less rolling shutter for video (unlike for stills, where the R6 does better with the electronic shutter), In my side by side test, the R6 overheated twice while recording for an hour and half, with a room temperature of 20˚C, you want better autofocus performance in all situations, you want better ergonomics and precise controls, you want better image stabilisation for stills, you want more choice among the native E-mount lenses. In my view, Canon has succeeded with the EOS R6. In my second test, the subject walked back and forth, then walked while turning 360˚. Editor’s note: this article has been updated with our real word tests and comparisons. Continuous shooting speed4. Noise increase from 12800 ISO on both cameras. Thank you! It’s difficult not to compare this new camera to the A7 III given its popularity. Canon R5 vs Sony A1. 90 points. There is a plethora of native lenses to choose between for the E-mount system, not just from Sony but also third-party brands, and that also means a better choice of affordable glass. See our video section further down for more details. Sports (Low-Light ISO) 3730 ISO. The A7 III also records in 4K but the maximum frame rate is 30p with a 1.2x crop (24p and 25p use the full width of the sensor however). Looking at the RAW files, with the same colour temperature and tint values, the R6 image is warmer and softer overall especially when it comes to the yellows and oranges, whereas the Sony has a reddish/magenta dominance. The R6 gave a splendid 95% keeper rate (60 shots in total for each walk) with only 1 shot out of focus and two slightly soft. Here is how the photos taken with each model look after a 4 stop exposure recovery in post production. (Note: for convenience, I’ve conformed the two images to the same size.).